Op-ed: Proposed judicial reforms could be foundation for establishing constitution in Israel

The Levin-Sa’ar judicial reform outline deserves serious public and professional discussion. Unlike Levin’s original reform proposal, the compromise now on the table is cautious and measured. It calls for balance, as is appropriate. Before we turn to the main course – the Judicial Selection Committee – it is important to note the proposed agreement regarding the principles of the “Basic Law: Legislation.” This, in my view, is significant news that could serve as a foundation for establishing a true constitution for Israel. Unlike the existing situation, under the proposal, the subjects addressed by Basic Laws will be limited only to matters worthy of a constitution; a unique procedure will be established for their legislation, amendment, or repeal; and a non-coalitional majority will be required in all matters relating to them. Therefore, the proposal that the court will not be able to interfere with Basic Laws (except for election laws) is also appropriate, thus respecting the sovereignty of the people through its elected representatives.
Read the full article here: Times of Israel